夏伟文(Har Wai Mun) & 赵梅伊(Tiew Mei Yi) (17th Feb 2014)
In July 2010, United Nations Entity
for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women) is created. This is
another milestone in current trend to empower women for gender equality. Non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) that promote women’s rights are aplenty in both developed
and developing countries including Malaysia. However, are women and men equal? Can
women and men have equal role in the economy? Until now, these two questions
have been discussed but not yet agreed upon any conclusive answer. Let’s begin
reviewing it with some interesting statistics and trend findings.
Statistics
and Trends
Various data on Malaysia and
international employment are collected from World Bank’s database. Equivalent
data by Malaysian states are sourced from Statistical Department of Malaysia. Analyzing
these data through three categories, namely (a) labor participation, (b)
education, and (c) unemployment reveal some interesting (or alarming) trends.
Labor participation
In term of labor participation rate
in Malaysia, female rate is lower than male rate since 1990 (earliest data
available date, see Figure 1). The highest different between these two labor
participation rates is 39.5 percentage-points in 1998. However, encouraging
sign is that the different is narrowing since 1998 to 33.1 percentage-points
recorded in the latest year 2011, mainly due to declining of male labor
participation rate (not shown in graph). For the period between 1990 and 2011, average
rate for female labor participation is 43.5% while male is 80.2%.
We selected 22 countries randomly
(and because of data availability) to do international comparative study.
Malaysia’s female labor participation rate on average is lower than developed
countries like United States (58%), Australia (55.1%), United Kingdom (53.9%),
Singapore (52.8%), Germany (49.5%), Japan (49.5%) and South Korea (48.8%) as
well as developing ASEAN neighbors of Thailand (66.2%), Indonesia (50.2%) and
Philippines (49.4%) (see Table 1). Iceland even achieved an average female
labor participation rate at 70.2%, which is an astonishing 26.7
percentage-point room for improvement for Malaysia.
Malaysian states that have highest
female labor participation rate in 2010 (latest available data from Statistical
Department of Malaysia) are Penang, Kuala Lumpur, Selangor and Sarawak.
Meanwhile, states with relatively lowest rate are Kelantan, Kedah, Terengganu,
Perak and Perlis. Coincidently or not, states with highest rate also recorded
relatively higher GDP per capita and vice versa. These are shown in Table 2 and
Figure 2 (top).
Figure
1: Malaysia's Labor Participation Rate
(Data source: World Bank
database)
Table 1: International Comparison: Labor
(Female) participation rate
No
|
Country
|
Average 1990 - 2011
|
2011
|
1
|
Iceland
|
70.2
|
70.8
|
2
|
Thailand
|
66.2
|
63.8
|
3
|
United States
|
58.0
|
57.5
|
4
|
New Zealand
|
57.7
|
61.6
|
5
|
Australia
|
55.1
|
58.8
|
6
|
Russian
|
55.0
|
56.3
|
7
|
United Kingdom
|
53.9
|
55.6
|
8
|
Italy
|
35.9
|
37.9
|
9
|
Portugal
|
53.1
|
56.5
|
10
|
Singapore
|
52.8
|
56.5
|
11
|
Netherlands
|
52.5
|
58.3
|
12
|
Indonesia
|
50.2
|
51.2
|
13
|
Hong Kong
|
49.6
|
51.0
|
14
|
Germany
|
49.5
|
53.0
|
15
|
Japan
|
49.5
|
49.4
|
16
|
Philippines
|
49.4
|
49.7
|
17
|
Korea, Rep
|
48.8
|
49.2
|
18
|
MALAYSIA
|
43.5
|
43.8
|
19
|
South Africa
|
42.1
|
44.0
|
20
|
Spain
|
41.8
|
51.6
|
21
|
Greece
|
39.8
|
44.8
|
22
|
Mexico
|
39.2
|
44.3
|
(Data source: World Bank
database, blue=Asian, green=European, orange=others)
Scatter chart in Figure 2 (bottom),
shows a positive relationship between female labor participation and GDP per
capita. The linear trend line is slopping upwards. This implies that increase
in female participation in the economy will help increase GDP per capita. However,
do our policies and Economic Transformation Programs (ETP) put enough efforts
to increase direct involvement of women in our economy?
Table 2: Top & Bottom States
Top States
|
Labor force
participation rate (Female),
2010
|
GDP per Capita for
year 2010 at Current Prices
|
Penang
|
56.2
(1st)
|
33456 (2nd)
|
KL
|
54.3
(2nd)
|
55951 (1st)
|
Selangor
|
52.2 (3rd)
|
31363 (4th)
|
Sarawak
|
50.0 (4th)
|
33307 (3rd)
|
Bottom States
|
||
Kelantan
|
41.7 (10th)
|
8273 (14th)
|
Kedah
|
41.3 (11th)
|
13294 (13th)
|
Terengganu
|
40.6 (12th)
|
19225 (10th)
|
Perak
|
40.2 (13th)
|
16088 (11th)
|
Perlis
|
34.8 (14th)
|
15296 (12th)
|
(Data source: Malaysia’s
Statistical Department)
Figure 2: Malaysia's Labor (Female) Participation Rate
& GDP per capita, 2010
(Source:
Malaysia’s Statistical Department; GDP at current prices)
Education
Ratio of female to male tertiary
education enrollment has never declined less than 100 levels since 1990 (see
Figure 3). This implies that female enrollment in tertiary education has always
been more than male. In term of secondary education, female to male ratio
dropped below 100 level since 2007 but still hold above 97 levels. Therefore,
female labor participation rate of never more than 50% as compare to male labor
participation average rate of 80% has been shocking. Female labors have been
just slightly more than half of male labors as indicated by the bar chart of “ratio
of female to male labor participation rate” in Figure 3. These statistics shows
that women do get equality (if not better) education opportunity relative than
male. The mystery is why they participation in labor market is relatively so
low?
Figure 3: Female-to-Male Ratio: Labor Force & Education
(Source: World
Bank)
Unemployment
Average
female unemployment rate from 1990 to 2010 is 3.8% as compared to 3.3% for
male. Female unemployment throughout that period is always higher than male
except for year 1999 and 2003 as shown in Figure 4. Asian Miracle years from 1980s
to 1997/98 Asian Crisis have greatly reduce unemployment rate for both female
and male. Post Asian Crisis era not only keeping both unemployment rates
between 3% and 4% but also has reduced the gap between female and male
unemployment rates. While female has higher tertiary enrollment as compared to
male, why their unemployment rate is still higher? Is it discrimination against
women?
Figure
5 presents female unemployment in descending order for all 14 states (minus
Labuan). Women unemployment rate is clearly higher than male in all states
except for Kuala Lumpur, Johor and Kelantan. Kelantan recorded the second lowest
female unemployment rate and is one and only state where male unemployment rate
is higher than female. Highest female unemployment rate states for 2010 are
Sabah (5.8%), Sarawak (4.7%) and Perlis (4.5%). Meanwhile, the states with
biggest unemployment gap between genders are Perak and Pahang. While states of
different size and development level like Melaka, Kelantan and Penang can
achieve a low female unemployment rate, why unemployment rate in states like
Sabah, Sarawak and Perlis can be twice as much?
Figure
4: Malaysia's Unemployment Rate by
Gender (%)
Figure
5: Unemployment Rate by States, 2010
(Source: Malaysia’s Statistical Department)
Conclusion
While we are hearing hope upon hope
for gender equality, actual statistic and trend revealed the darker side of
reality. Malaysia’s female labor participation rate has been sustained around
43% without breakthrough improvement. This rate is still way below many
developed and developing countries in the world. Education seems not a
deterrent factor for woman to participate actively in our economy. Indeed,
female has better enrollment ratio to male. Yet, statistics show that female
unemployment is higher.
It
is not true that non-working women (example, housewife) did not contribute to
the economy. In contrast, it is important and beneficial that women play more
active role and direct participation into the economy, particularly the women
group with substantial education. They are the human capital for growth. Hence,
more and more understandings and critical debates are still needed to realize
the hope for gender equality in term of employment, opportunity and role to the
economy.
[Chinese version published at Nanyang Press, 17th February 2014. Available online at http://www.nanyang.com/node/600218. This English version may be slightly different from the Chinese online/printed newspaper version]
No comments:
Post a Comment